Tinetti Balance Test
This is a two-step screening method that evaluates balance and gait impairment to provide fall risk.
You can read more about the score interpretation and original study in the text below the calculator.
The Tinetti balance test evaluates static and dynamic balance during a 10 to 15-minute assessment. It is also known as the Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA).
There are two sections in the test, each targeting a different functionality: balance (with 9 items) and gait (with 8 items).
The Tinetti test has been performed on older populations suffering from conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, stroke, normal pressure hydrocephalus or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
The original study conducted by Mary Tinetti in 1986 involved a cohort of 79 patients admitted to 3 intermediate care facilities.
Each subject’s fall score was represented by the number of index factors present during evaluation.
Compared to other fall predicting models, the Tinetti test has established better test-retest and discriminative validity.
Scores equal to or less than 18 indicate high fall risk, scores between 19 and 23 indicate moderate risk while scores of 24 and above suggest that the patient presents a low fall risk.
Send Us Your Feedback
Steps on how to print your input & results:
1. Fill in the calculator/tool with your values and/or your answer choices and press Calculate.
2. Then you can click on the Print button to open a PDF in a separate window with the inputs and results. You can further save the PDF or print it.
Please note that once you have closed the PDF you need to click on the Calculate button before you try opening it again, otherwise the input and/or results may not appear in the pdf.
Tinetti balance test explained
This balance and gait model represents a clinical evaluation of fall risk. It is also known as the Tinetti Mobility Test or as the Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA).
Whilst in this test, the two sections need to be performed together in an integrated 10 to 15-minute assessment, if needed to check different functionality, the two sections may be used separately.
The instruction for the balance section has the subject seated in a hard, armless chair, while performing different actions, as required by the assessor.
The instruction for the gait assessment has the subject stand up and walk across the room or down the hallway, first at a “usual pace” then back at a more rapid pace.
Where there is hesitation and rising from chair in stages, the patient may have problems with proprioception or the cerebellar areas of balance.
In case walking assistance is required, the assessor will provide it and will also make a note of this. Examples of abnormalities during walking include abnormal knee extension, high stepping, toe dragging or shuffling gait.
The following table introduces the items in the Tinetti balance test:
|Item||Balance section||Answers (points)|
|1||Sitting balance||Leans or slides in chair (0)
Steady, safe (1)
|2||Rises from chair||Unable to without help (0)
Able, uses arms to help (1)
Able without use of arms (2)
|3||Attempts to rise||Unable to without help (0)
Able, requires >1 attempt (1)
Able to rise, 1 attempt (2)
|4||Immediate standing balance (first 5 seconds)||Unsteady (staggers, moves feet, trunk sway) (0)
Steady but uses walker or other support (1)
Steady without walker or other support (2)
|5||Standing balance||Unsteady (0)
Steady but wide stance and uses support (1)
Narrow stance without support (2)
|6||Nudged||Begins to fall (0)
Staggers, grabs, catches self (1)
|7||Eyes closed||Unsteady (0)
|8A||Turning 360 degrees - steps||Discontinuous steps (0)
|8B||Turning 360 degrees - steadiness||Unsteady (grabs, staggers) (0)
|9||Sitting down||Unsafe (misjudged distance, falls into chair) (0)
Uses arms or not a smooth motion (1)
Safe, smooth motion (2)
|Gait section||Answers (points)|
|10||Indication of gait (Immediately after told to ‘go’.)||Any hesitancy or multiple attempts (0)
No hesitancy (1)
|11A||Step length and height - Right||Step to (0)
Step through R (1)
|11B||Step length and height - Left||Step to (0)
Step through L (1)
|12A||Foot clearance - Right||Foot drop (0)
R foot clears floor (1)
|12B||Foot clearance - Left||Foot drop (0)
L foot clears floor (1)
|13||Step symmetry||Right and left step lengths not equal (0)
Right and left step lengths appear equal (1)
|14||Step continuity||Stopping or discontinuity between steps (0)
Steps appear continuous (1)
|15||Path||Marked deviation (0)
Mild/moderate deviation or uses w. aid (1)
Straight without w. aid (2)
|16||Trunk||Marked sway or uses w. aid (0)
No sway but flex. knees or back or uses arms for stability (1)
No sway, flex., use of arms or w. aid (2)
|17||Walking time||Heels apart (0)
Heels almost touching while walking (1)
The above fall risk test can be used in addition to other balance or mobility tools such as the Berg balance scale.
There are other models that offer a similar mobility evaluation, such as the Elderly mobility scale, but instead of fall risk, focus on the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living.
Tinetti score interpretation
The balance section consists of 9 items whilst the gait section consists of 8 items.
Each of these items has answer choices that are weighted on an ordinal scale from 0 to 1 or 2.
This depends on the severity of the impairment that is observed, where 0 is most severe and 2 indicates the ability to perform said tasks independently.
The balance section scores range between 0 and 16 whilst the gait section scores are between 0 and 12.
Therefore the maximum attainable score in the Tinetti balance test is 28.
The guideline is that the higher the score, the higher the degree of functional independence in the patient.
The following table introduces the three score categories and their interpretation:
|Tinetti score||Fall risk interpretation|
|Below 19||High fall risk|
|19 - 23||Moderate fall risk|
|24 and above||Low fall risk|
About the study
The original study was conducted in 1986 by Mary Tinetti in 1986 and involved a cohort of seventy-nine elderly patients admitted to three intermediate care facilities. From these, twenty-five became recurrent fallers.
Each subject’s fall risk score was the number of index factors present during evaluation, where the more risk factors, the higher the fall risk.
The test has proven better test-retest and discriminative validity than the Up and Go test (TUG) and is known as a dynamic assessment of mobility.
Tinetti ME, Williams TF, Mayewski R. Fall risk index for elderly patients based on number of chronic disabilities. Am J Med. 1986; 80(3):429-34.
1. Lin MR, Hwang HF, Hu MH, Wu HD, Wang YW, Huang FC. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52(8):1343-8.
2. Mancini M, Horak FB. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010; 46(2): 239–248.
No. Of Items: 17
Year Of Study: 1986
Published On: April 3, 2017 · 10:08 AM
Last Checked: April 3, 2017
Next Review: April 3, 2023